A crypto mixer is a service that mixes the user’s cryptocurrency funds. It hides their link to the original deposit address by returning different outputs with identical values. This makes it impossible to track the original deposits.

Mixers are increasingly being used by cybercriminals. The increase in the number of criminal addresses that move to mixers coincides with the growth in DeFi protocols and other illicit activities.


Although cryptocurrency transactions are not as anonymous as cash, a person’s identity cannot be traced via the blockchain, which records all Bitcoin activity. However, this anonymity is not foolproof. Moreover, the blockchain is public, so anyone can look up wallet addresses that have been used. To overcome these limitations, crypto mixers combine transactions and obfuscate wallet addresses. Mixers also charge a fee for their services, usually 3% of the total transaction amount.

But it’s important to understand how these services work and how they can be misused. Despite their popularity, mixing services are not a substitute for a secure wallet or the use of private keys. In addition, they can be used to launder funds from illegal activities like drug sales, ransomware attacks, and hacking.

The popular mixer service Helix is a prime example. It was used by criminals to launder $300 million. The mixer is able to separate tainted coins and deposit them into new ones, which makes it nearly impossible for investigators to track the original source.

But despite the high number of frauds, there are still many people who believe that cryptocurrency mixers will protect them from government surveillance and law enforcement. This is a mistake. The truth is that the services offered by crypto mixers are not auditable, do not provide reliable tech support, and can be used to hide illicit activities.


Mixing services combine coins deposited by users in tens or hundreds of small transactions. This hides the amount deposited by each user and makes it difficult to track their identity. They also charge a fee, which is used to pay the miners that perform the mixing. This is an important part of the bitcoin mining process and is essential to maintaining the network’s security.

Cryptocurrency mixing is a vital tool for those who want to stay anonymous when making purchases or donations, and to protect their privacy in p2p transactions. However, these services are not foolproof, and can be tracked by law enforcement agencies. For example, the US government recently announced sanctions against Tornado Cash, a popular mixer that helped people launder money from illicit activities.

The use of cryptocurrency mixers has increased dramatically since 2020, with 2022 seeing a near-record high in volumes sent to these services. This growth is driven by centralized exchanges, DeFi protocols, and most importantly, addresses connected to illicit activity, which now account for 23% of all funds moved to mixers, according to Chainanalysis.

These services are a thorny issue for both regulators and the community, as they pose a serious threat to the integrity of the blockchain. While there are legitimate use cases for these services, it is impossible to ignore the fact that many of them are being used by criminals and should be viewed with suspicion.


Mixers help to improve the anonymity of bitcoin transactions by mixing potentially identifiable cryptocurrency funds with vast sums of money from other sources. This can make a transaction extremely difficult to trace. In addition to this, mixers charge a fee for their services.

The fees associated with mixer transactions can be significant, but there are some ways to mitigate the costs. For example, using a decentralized mixer instead of a centralized one can significantly reduce the fees. A centralized mixer can also be more vulnerable to attacks, which can expose user information and compromise the security of their assets.

However, there are still serious concerns about the use of bitcoin mixer for illicit purposes. For example, the US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has levied sanctions against several mixers. The use of mixers by ransomware threat actors is particularly concerning. These schemes rely on mixers to launder the money they earn.

The UK’s National Crime Agency is calling for mixers to implement know-your-customer checks and to keep track of the audit trails of the tokens that pass through them. The NCA’s Gary Cathcart has compared the role of mixers to the role that cash plays in traditional banking, allowing threat actors to keep their earnings hidden from regulators and law enforcement. Cathcart believes that if mixers are regulated, it would be much easier to fight ransomware and other cybercrimes.


Mixers are a common tool of choice for cybercriminals to hide their identity and transactions. These services offer a variety of ways to obscure the origin and destination of cryptocurrency. Some of them are centralized and may freeze funds; others use privacy-enhancing techniques like coinjoins, which make it difficult for observers to track transactions.

Cryptocurrency mixers are also used to launder illicit proceeds. For example, ransomware attackers often seek payment in Bitcoins after their attacks, and the US Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network recently banned a darknet marketplace called Hydra for facilitating drug sales and hacking tools. Other illicit activity on Hydra included stealing user login credentials and selling them to other markets.

Some of the larger mixers are becoming more reputable, and they offer additional features to protect users’ privacy. For example, Wasabi Wallet is a non-custodial mixing service that uses a technique known as coinjoin to make it more difficult to trace transactions. Using this method, Wasabi Wallet mixes coins in pools and sends them to new addresses after each transaction.

However, this is not a foolproof way to hide transactions. Law enforcement agencies can still connect the dots and follow a transaction to its intended destination. This is why mixing services are not a substitute for proper security practices, as they can still be tracked by blockchain tracking tools.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *